As highly selective admissions announce their decisions today and next week (here are the numbers!), the question in the aftermath [for counselors like me] is always this one:
If 85-90% of the students applying to these schools are admissible (according to the admission deans), then how do these admission officers make their decisions?
I would offer my iceberg analogy.
This is something I drew up on a napkin while listening to Bill Fitzsimmons talk about admissions at Harvard at the Harvard Institute.
90% of the reasons why or why not are underneath the surface.
Where we will never know why.
Which often then translates to students beating themselves up over the 10% above the surface that had NOTHING to do with the decision made.
Thursday, March 27, 2014
Tuesday, March 25, 2014
Bracketology and Highly Selective College Admissions
How's your NCAA bracket looking?
Confession.
I filled out 8 brackets.
And all of them have been blown to smithereens.
I'm proud to say though I picked Dayton vs. Stanford.
I'm not proud to say I also picked Western Michigan, Louisiana Lafayette, and Western Kentucky.
Which brings me to the correlation between bracketology and highly selective admissions.
We're about to enter the two major 24 hour windows of time where all the #1 seeds reveal their winners and losers...and maybes.
I probably have 68 or so admission decisions pending for my students at those "blue blood" schools.
Enough to fill out a NCAA-like bracket.
And mentally I do it every year.
I try my best to prognosticate who will win and advance and who will lose and well go somewhere else.
And every year I do about as well in my "highly selective admission bracket" as I do in my NCAA bracket.
There are kids who like Mercer don't beat Duke but get into Duke...and I didn't see it coming.
And there are kids who like Wichita State are undefeated in college admissions right up until April 1st and then they get smeared...and I didn't see it coming.
The reality is that highly selective admissions is simply too unpredictable these days.
The application volume. Plus...
The pressures for greater selectivity (which means lower admit rates and higher yield rates). Plus...
The institutional agenda. Plus...
The hidden variables that come into play in making very complex, highly nuanced decisions.
This article is an excellent reminder of what a "crap shoot" highly selective admissions is today.
As Mr. Gould points out in the following article, admission decisions say very little about the student, and much more about the institution making those decisions.
In the end, if a student's application list is balanced, then that student will have some excellent final choices that a majority of 18-year old's would give anything for.
March Madness is certainly my favorite time of year (other than the Masters in April) as a sports fan...but my least favorite time of the year as a college counselor.
But in the end, I'm always surprised how each student ends up where he or she is able to get a great college education.
Confession.
I filled out 8 brackets.
And all of them have been blown to smithereens.
I'm proud to say though I picked Dayton vs. Stanford.
I'm not proud to say I also picked Western Michigan, Louisiana Lafayette, and Western Kentucky.
Which brings me to the correlation between bracketology and highly selective admissions.
We're about to enter the two major 24 hour windows of time where all the #1 seeds reveal their winners and losers...and maybes.
I probably have 68 or so admission decisions pending for my students at those "blue blood" schools.
Enough to fill out a NCAA-like bracket.
And mentally I do it every year.
I try my best to prognosticate who will win and advance and who will lose and well go somewhere else.
And every year I do about as well in my "highly selective admission bracket" as I do in my NCAA bracket.
There are kids who like Mercer don't beat Duke but get into Duke...and I didn't see it coming.
And there are kids who like Wichita State are undefeated in college admissions right up until April 1st and then they get smeared...and I didn't see it coming.
The reality is that highly selective admissions is simply too unpredictable these days.
The application volume. Plus...
The pressures for greater selectivity (which means lower admit rates and higher yield rates). Plus...
The institutional agenda. Plus...
The hidden variables that come into play in making very complex, highly nuanced decisions.
This article is an excellent reminder of what a "crap shoot" highly selective admissions is today.
As Mr. Gould points out in the following article, admission decisions say very little about the student, and much more about the institution making those decisions.
In the end, if a student's application list is balanced, then that student will have some excellent final choices that a majority of 18-year old's would give anything for.
March Madness is certainly my favorite time of year (other than the Masters in April) as a sports fan...but my least favorite time of the year as a college counselor.
But in the end, I'm always surprised how each student ends up where he or she is able to get a great college education.
Tuesday, March 11, 2014
The Story Behind the SAT Overhaul....Excellent Read
If you want the extended, full disclosure story behind the overhaul of the SAT, then I would invite you to read this article from The Times.
The article raises important questions about standardized testing.
The reality is that standardized testing has simply reinforced the savage inequalities that have existed socioeconomically.
Standardized tests advantage the advantaged.
And disadvantage the disadvantaged.
Scores, in other words, reveal zip codes and income brackets.
Not raw acumen and intellectual ability.
Not to mention intellectual curiosity and creativity and innovation (does any standardized test reveal this?).
Standardized tests are here to stay...at least at 80% of the colleges and universities out there.
It's a $4.5 billion dollar cash cow for the empire called The College Board.
Hopefully though the new SAT will provide ways to create a more even playing field for students.
The article raises important questions about standardized testing.
The reality is that standardized testing has simply reinforced the savage inequalities that have existed socioeconomically.
Standardized tests advantage the advantaged.
And disadvantage the disadvantaged.
Scores, in other words, reveal zip codes and income brackets.
Not raw acumen and intellectual ability.
Not to mention intellectual curiosity and creativity and innovation (does any standardized test reveal this?).
Standardized tests are here to stay...at least at 80% of the colleges and universities out there.
It's a $4.5 billion dollar cash cow for the empire called The College Board.
Hopefully though the new SAT will provide ways to create a more even playing field for students.
Thursday, March 6, 2014
New SAT 1 Unveiled
I was at the Harvard Summer Institute last June when College Board President, David Coleman, gave us - college deans and counselors - a sneak preview of the radical changes coming to the SAT 1.
Two sections only again.
Scored on the traditional 1600 scale.
An optional essay. What....optional?
"Real world" vocabulary words.
So fewer words like parsimonious and inchoate.
And more words like synthesis and adaptability.
21st century words, in other words.
Data driven math.
Evidence-based literary analysis.
Less archaic and more relevant literature.
Like MLK's Letter from a Birmingham Jail.
And the Declaration of Independence.
And health care equivalent of free, universal test prep through Khan Academy!
This is a step in good direction....IF colleges and universities are going to continue to use standardized test scores to conquer and divide...excuse me, I mean bolster their ranking status...I mean evaluate the applicant's ability to succeed in their freshman year.
Nevertheless, I'm not sure if a overhauled test will change the fact that only 42% (according to the College Board) of the US test taking population scored high enough to qualify as "college ready."
That said, I don't foresee the new SAT 1 having a significant impact on the Casady community.
We have steadily seen 15% of our seniors submit SAT I scores to colleges.
85% still prefer and score highest on the ACT.
But it will certainly change the game for our kids in terms of the PSAT...and National Merit.
Here is a link to an excellent article explaining the new SAT 1 that will be fully functional in the spring of 2016.
Two sections only again.
Scored on the traditional 1600 scale.
An optional essay. What....optional?
"Real world" vocabulary words.
So fewer words like parsimonious and inchoate.
And more words like synthesis and adaptability.
21st century words, in other words.
Data driven math.
Evidence-based literary analysis.
Less archaic and more relevant literature.
Like MLK's Letter from a Birmingham Jail.
And the Declaration of Independence.
And health care equivalent of free, universal test prep through Khan Academy!
This is a step in good direction....IF colleges and universities are going to continue to use standardized test scores to conquer and divide...excuse me, I mean bolster their ranking status...I mean evaluate the applicant's ability to succeed in their freshman year.
Nevertheless, I'm not sure if a overhauled test will change the fact that only 42% (according to the College Board) of the US test taking population scored high enough to qualify as "college ready."
That said, I don't foresee the new SAT 1 having a significant impact on the Casady community.
We have steadily seen 15% of our seniors submit SAT I scores to colleges.
85% still prefer and score highest on the ACT.
But it will certainly change the game for our kids in terms of the PSAT...and National Merit.
Here is a link to an excellent article explaining the new SAT 1 that will be fully functional in the spring of 2016.
Saturday, February 8, 2014
Interesting in Out-of-State Public U's?
One major trend emerging in higher education involves the rising costs of attending an out-of-state universities.
It's generally understood that non-residents can anticipate paying twice what in-state resident students pay at flagship public universities.
But now public institutions are becoming increasingly "need aware" in the admission process.
At the Harvard Institute this last summer, I heard a number of deans of admission from highly selective public universities flat out say, "We're looking for full pay kids."
Bottom line: students and families need to become more aware of how "need aware" policies are factoring into admission decisions.
This article sheds light on this emerging trend. It's worth taking the time to read it.
It's generally understood that non-residents can anticipate paying twice what in-state resident students pay at flagship public universities.
But now public institutions are becoming increasingly "need aware" in the admission process.
At the Harvard Institute this last summer, I heard a number of deans of admission from highly selective public universities flat out say, "We're looking for full pay kids."
Bottom line: students and families need to become more aware of how "need aware" policies are factoring into admission decisions.
This article sheds light on this emerging trend. It's worth taking the time to read it.
Tuesday, January 14, 2014
What is Confounding, Absurd, and Miasmic? Here's a Hint: It starts with a S and ends with P, H, Y
Recently a colleague sent me this article from the Stanford Magazine.
It explored the confounding, absurd, and miasmic underbelly of highly selective admissions.
It's crazy to think that last year at Stanford, for example, as the article points out, that 69% of the applicants who had perfect SAT scores were denied.
800 + 800 + 800 = No Thanks!
This little juicy factoid underscores again that the schools at the top of the food chain have a set of hidden agendas (aka "institutional goals") that drive this admission process.
One of the graphics that I found helpful was this one.
This graph reveals the meteoric rise in applications to the Big 3 + Stanford over the last decade.
As well as the sharp plunge in the admit rate.
Now when any student or family in the future comes to me with ambitions to gain admission to one of these schools, I have a great introductory article to provide them to calibrate their expectations.
Thanks, Stanford.
It explored the confounding, absurd, and miasmic underbelly of highly selective admissions.
It's crazy to think that last year at Stanford, for example, as the article points out, that 69% of the applicants who had perfect SAT scores were denied.
800 + 800 + 800 = No Thanks!
This little juicy factoid underscores again that the schools at the top of the food chain have a set of hidden agendas (aka "institutional goals") that drive this admission process.
One of the graphics that I found helpful was this one.
This graph reveals the meteoric rise in applications to the Big 3 + Stanford over the last decade.
As well as the sharp plunge in the admit rate.
Now when any student or family in the future comes to me with ambitions to gain admission to one of these schools, I have a great introductory article to provide them to calibrate their expectations.
Thanks, Stanford.
Thursday, December 19, 2013
Early College Acceptances!!!!
For the past week, Casady seniors have been hearing back from colleges and universities that they applied to early
So far our 74 seniors have been admitted to 41 different schools.
This list grows by the day.
In the midst of the most competitive admission cycle in US history, the Class of 2014 has had incredible success among some of the most prestigious technological, research, and liberal arts schools in the US and abroad.
That said, we are proud of EVERY college acceptance that our seniors have received thus far...and to come in the months ahead!
Our mission continues to focus on finding the best college fit for each student.
Click here to see a map of where the Class of 2014 has already found a college fit!
So far our 74 seniors have been admitted to 41 different schools.
This list grows by the day.
In the midst of the most competitive admission cycle in US history, the Class of 2014 has had incredible success among some of the most prestigious technological, research, and liberal arts schools in the US and abroad.
That said, we are proud of EVERY college acceptance that our seniors have received thus far...and to come in the months ahead!
Our mission continues to focus on finding the best college fit for each student.
Click here to see a map of where the Class of 2014 has already found a college fit!
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)



